Born
into darkness would be a term for this man if I weren't worried
about infringing on the modern day vampire novels of Anne Rice.
Vlad
III Dracula (real name Vlad Tepes) was a prince of a small region
of Romania named Wallachia in the 15th century. His time in power
was short. There wasn’t fame and fortune linked with his
ancestors. Still this man is remembered more than any royalty
of that country, locally and all over the world. What makes Vlad
Tepes an infamous figure in our modern day world? Because he’s
a vampire, that’s why.
“Really, is he?” I’m sure your asking. Look
most recently at the best selling novel The Historian by Elizabeth
Kostova , which successfully weaves the true history and the myth.
Still we must ask if this would have been a theory not for the
original work of Bram Stoker, who penned the novel Dracula in
1897. This is the focus of the connection with Vlad.
Recent studies show that Bram Stoker had no knowledge of the Wallachian
prince. The only connection found was a short friendship with
a professor from Budapest who may have mentioned the name once.
We know for sure that the author never visited either of Vlad’s
two castles of Bran and Poienari.
The
connections between the fictional Dracula and the Vlad are undeniable.
Vlad Tepes name was Vlad III Dracula. Dracula is an old Romanian
word meaning “Son of the dragon” or “Son of
the demon” (named after his father who is discussed below).
Dracula’s
castle is in Transylvania, Romania. Vlad lived in Wallachia, Romania.
Nobody’s aware why Mr. Stoker did the change of venue. Maybe
to confuse historian’s and make the character more real.
Maybe it comes down to the sheer spooky tone of the word Transylvania,
as if it should be followed by a sinister laugh and a clap of
lightning.
Another interesting point that I personally just found out which
questions my abilities for common sense, deals with the wooden
stake. If plunged into the chest and through the heart of the
vampire Dracula, it would kill him instantly in a cloud of dust.
Now picture the larger version planted into the earth upon the
15th century battlefields of Romania. Upon the stake would be
placed the defeated, naked and living soldier in a form of torture
and punishment called Impaling.
A horse tied to each leg would force the stake’s point into
his rectum to set it. The stake then lifted allowing gravity to
begin its slow murder. Over hours and sometimes days the stake
would make its way through the soldiers body until coming out
the mouth and ending the torture.
Vlad Tepes made this method of torture famous for all generations
to follow, also known as Vlad III Dracula.
The
Man in History
__________________________________

Vlad Tepes
was the grandson of Mircea the Elder, prince of Wallachia during
a great time of war between Hungary and the Ottoman Empire. Right
in the middle of the fighting, his home region would become a
constant and bloody battleground as both wanted strategic control.
Vlad II was
a born to Mircea an illegitimate son. A leader from childhood,
Vlad II was soon notice by the “Order of the Dragon”.
This was a society created for all surrounding countries to stand
up against the great Ottoman Empire. This is where Vlad II was
given the nickname or “Dracul”, or dragon. Then in
1431 the Order showed their confidence in the leader by giving
him the throne of Wallachia.
Time may have
proven this the wrong decision as pressures from the Ottoman sultan
caused Vlad II to give up some very precious items to secure the
safety of Wallachia. Those items were his two younger sons, including
Vlad III.
Would he
have done it with knowledge of the man his son would become? This
marks the beginning of Vlad’s training and an education
into a world cruelty and death.
Vlad was whipped
by his Ottoman captors for being stubborn and rude. This developed
his hatred for the man who led these captors, a man who would
become the future sultan. But most of all the hatred for his own
father grew from his captivity and for betraying the Order of
the Dragon for which Vlad III would become a member at the age
of five. The nickname Vlad III Dracula, or “Son of the Dragon”,
was bestowed on him immediately.
Vlad II Dracul
remained prince until 1442 when he was accused of disloyalty to
Wallachia. Only a year later the Turks got him back in power.
This lasted until 1447 when the Turks, turning on their once puppet
prince, assassinated Vlad II by means of scalping (cutting the
edges of the face and pulling the skin from his skull while alive).
All was against Vlad’s family as his brother was dead at
the time from political enemies. They buried him alive.
This abandoned
throne became an opportunity for control of the war-torn region
and the sultan was quick to put young Vlad in place. It was very
brief and remained uneventful until Wallachia was invaded. Vlad
ran from his power and escaped to Moldavia and to his influential
uncle for protection. He remained in exile until 1456 when he
returned to the throne and began the most memorable reign of any
royalty in Romania, one of cruelty and torture that would become
legend and reach through the fabric of time to an author in 1897.
A
Cruel Leader? A Hero?
__________________________________
Why the confusion?
It matters where you come from. Those from Romania see Vlad III
Dracula as one of their best leaders and the man who removed crime
from their streets and protected the pivotal landscape from invading
armies. Still it’s agreed all over of the prince’s
violent nature. Punishment for crimes in Wallachia was swift,
violent and cruel. This fear is what made the streets safe. This
is a blunt nature that the Romanian’s of the time admired.
Outside Romania
the view was much, much different. Some of the stories told of
Vlad’s battle style still make folks cringe even in today’s
ultra-violent video game world.
One story
happened when Vlad went after a rival prince. The prince ran and
took shelter in a near-by village. Vlad sent an army after him
and had them show no mercy to the helpful folks. Thousands were
impaled in front of their town gates, all charged with sheltering
the enemy prince. When he was finally flushed out, the soldiers
dragged him over to an open grave. He was forced on his knees
at the foot of the hole and made to proclaim his funeral eulogy.
They murdered him on the spot and pushed his body into the dirt.
Vlad
is removed from the throne
____________________________________________
Moving forward
we find Vlad being challenged by an Ottoman army invasion towards
the end of his reign. With a much smaller army he was forced to
orchestrate guerilla style attacks. Still the sultan was able
to gain access to Wallachia and steal the throne. Vlad’s
brother Radu, still a pro-Ottoman, was installed as the prince
and told to turn on his brother.
It was the
fruits of this event which was so beautifully recreated at the
beginning of Francis Ford Copplola’s version of Dracula.
The depiction of Vlad’s wife throwing herself into the Arges
River below Poienari Castle was a true event. She would rather
die than allow the Ottomans to take her prisoner.
Vlad was
captured and put into captivity for 12 years. During this time
he secured his release by charming the Ottomans and even marrying
a relative of one of his captures. He would have two children
with her and lived a pretty normal life. Then in 1475 he was able
to get back the throne of Wallachia after organizing an up rise
with the help of loyal friends from Wallachia and surrounding
regions.
Vlad’s
friends left him on the throne with no defenses and returned to
Transylvania. The sultan saw this mistake and quickly sent a large
army to kill Vlad. The timing was perfect. Vlad heard of this
and quickly gathered a small force. They bravely marched out to
meet the enemy.
Vlad would
not return alive. There is some debate on how he died. Some say
he was killed in battle, others that he was betrayed by a member
of his own group. Still, he didn’t die in the same gruesome
manner that was employed throughout his rein.
The Turks
didn’t find the body until after the battle was done. The
soldiers decapitated him (Sound familiar? One of the ways to kill
a vampire). Vlad’s head was sent back to the sultan preserved
in honey to slow decay. It was displayed publicly as proof the
good citizens could relax because the tyrant was dead.
The body was
supposedly buried at Snagov Monastery in the middle of Snagov
Lake. It was only a recent discovery through excavations of the
burial site that revealed no remains. To think that this area
of the Monastery, thought to be a grave for hundreds of years,
was empty. A Romanian trick?
More
stories as proof of Vlad's cruelty
____________________________________________
Once again
I must remind you of 15th century Romania. This was a much harder
time and place than today’s North America. Even modern day
Romania is much tougher than we could understand. To this day
Vlad III is considered a high figure in Romanian history and much
of his atrocities viewed as pure legend or a feasible reaction
to an outbreak of crime locally and war abroad. Still, recounting
these stories is bound to get a reaction from anybody, anywhere.
That reaction could be both pride and disgust.
We all know
now that impaling was Vlad’s favorite way to punish. The
strategic reasons have not been lost with time. For accomplishing
these mass murders on whole towns required some thought and reflection.
Victims would
need to be setup in rows with higher ranking officials at the
front. This was done to great their fellow countrymen with the
most recognizable and to mock them into leading even in death.
The dead would surround the town’s gates at the most prominent
location. The shock would be to remind the soldiers of their fate
if they continue into Vlad’s domain.
This fate
didn’t only fall upon the enemy. Legends still stand which
tell about mass impalements performed on Romanian citizens in
towns that swore allegiance to Vlad. Two instances stand the test
of time. One isn’t clear, but the other tells of a town
where the merchants would defy Vlad’s laws constantly. An
example was made of them which would set any governing body straight.
The swift
and merciless punishment had its affect on the criminal element
as well. Crime disappeared completely in Wallachia. A common legend
originating from this time said that a person may leave a bag
of gold in the town square of the largest city, and when they
return the next day that gold would be there untouched. Many a
leader has used this example over the years. You can see one version
in Martin Scorsese “Gangs of New York”.
My final story
tells of how Vlad’s Poienari Castle was built. When reaching
the throne for the second time in 1456, one of his first social
events was the throwing of a party for all some important noblemen.
They were the ones accused of murdering his father and brother.
They were
hesitant but felt that Vlad realized the cost of politics and
that he came around to obtain their support and money. The party
was a smashing success. Just as the noblemen and their families
were to leave for home, Vlad’s soldiers marched into the
great hall and surrounded them.
Immediately
he ordered the deaths of all the older, feeble noblemen with their
families. The younger ones were chained and lead out the room
for a difficult journey to the ruins of an old castle by the Arges
River. They were made to setup camp and begin work on a new and
larger castle which would stand as a monument to Vlad’s
greatness. With little to eat the workers quickly withered away,
their cloths falling from the skin and bones that once made a
healthy body. None of them survived.
The
End... or is it?
____________________________________________
I pulled out my famous saying for a good cause. The debate over
whether Vlad III Dracula was/is a vampire still rages to this
day. Many believe that the craze began with that author who immortalized
this monster in text and that he lead it (even after death) for
over 100 years. With this kind of legend it’s only natural
to wonder if the beginning was based in reality.
Look at the
novel The Historian. Imagine Vlad wasn’t dead. Imagine that
he was walking around with us to this day. Consider that strange
man with the rounded features and dark glasses (thank Francis
Ford Coppola!) walking by you on the sidewalk at night. You get
a vibe about this guy, he’s strange but who isn’t
on the streets of Hamilton at night. Then, just as the hair on
the back of your neck goes down, you’re wrapped in an iron
embrace and two stabs pierce the skin of your neck. All fades
into nothingness.
Life may
fade back into being, if you’re one of the lucky ones. Then
you see a new light which encompasses all around you. This light
doesn’t fade with time. It shines upon all those living
around you, tempting you, making you to want their life.
But that’s
all just fiction dreamed up by creative authors, directors and
actors. It can’t be possible to sustain life without a beating
heart and soul. To live off of another’s blood. To be immortal
and never have sickness or diseases touch you. It can’t
be true.
Article
By: Daniel
Cumerlato
Founding
Partner of Haunted Hamilton
Posted:
Wednesday, January 2, 2008
|